Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Gonzalez et al v. Little K's Landscaping, LLC et al
as 3:2021cv01551
Plaintiff:
Jairo Gonzalez, Esvelin Perez and Darwin Morales Diaz
Defendant:
Little K's Landscaping, LLC and Karl Kieslich, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Perea et al v. Industrial Pallet, LLC et al
as 3:2021cv00533
Plaintiff:
Raymundo Aguilera Zamudio, Francisco Gonzalez, Hugo Ros and others
Defendant:
Randy Therrien, Industrial Pallet, LLC, Joseph O'Brien and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Perez et al v. Goodfellas Cafe LLC et al
as 3:2015cv00642
Plaintiff:
Abimael Perez , Isain Ceron , Misael Morales and others
Defendant:
Goodfellas Cafe LLC , Gennaro Iannaccone , Andrea Coppola and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Mendez et al v. Pure Foods Management Group, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv01515
Defendant:
Pure Foods Management Group, Inc. , Shahid Hashmi , Fazal Panezai and others
Plaintiff:
Jess Gonzalez , Juan Mendez and Byron Herman
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
v. Pure Foods Management Group, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv01515
Defendant:
Pure Foods Management Group, Inc., Shahid Hashmi, Fazal Panezai and others
Plaintiff:
Jess Gonzalez , Juan Mendez and Byron Herman
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Gonzalez v. Premier Cash Wash LLC et al
as 3:2014cv00496
Plaintiff:
Armando Gonzalez
Defendant:
Vincent Joseph Farrell , Ratko Pejovic , Premier Car Wash LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Poynton et al v. Waterbury
as 3:2012cv00096
Plaintiff:
Troy Poynton, Michael Achlioptas, Marco Albino and others
Defendant:
City of Waterbury
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Espina et al v. A-1 Landscaping & Masonry et al
as 3:2008cv00229
Plaintiff:
Omar Espina, Edgar Gonzalez, Roberto Monterrozo and others
Defendant:
A-1 Landscaping & Masonry and William McMasters
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
