Cases 1 - 10 of 18
MONTERO v. J A ALEXANDER, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv21679
Defendant:
J A ALEXANDER INC, REBCO CONSTRUCTION, INC., ESSEX CONSTRUCTION, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
CRISTIAN ROMERO MONTERO
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
ANGELES et al v. MR. SOS LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00807
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER ANGELES and ANTHONY FORGIONE
Defendant:
MR. SOS LLC, ALEX KOGAN and BRIAN ZILBER
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
AGUILAR v. SEDCO CONTRACTING, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv01557
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER JIMENEZ AGUILAR
Defendant:
SEDCO CONTRACTING, LLC and JOSEPH SEDLAK
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
RIVERA GARCIA v. NORTH EASTERN OPERATIONS GROUP LLC
as 3:2019cv19448
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER RIVERA GARCIA
Defendant:
NORTH EASTERN OPERATIONS GROUP LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
YU et al v. CATHAY HOME INCORPORATED et al
as 2:2019cv17623
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
LIWEI FANG, CATHAY HOME INCORPORATED, JAIMY YANG and others
Plaintiff:
CHIUCHI ALEXANDER YU and SIUYUK PAK
Defendant:
GO SERVICE MANAGEMENT LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ACOSTA v. VOORHEES DINER CORPORATION et al
as 1:2019cv14297
Plaintiff:
R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA
Defendant:
VOORHEES DINER CORPORATION and MARK KLEIN
ACOSTA v. MAKASI et al
as 2:2018cv16465
Plaintiff:
R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA
Defendant:
ROBERT JESTINOS MAKASI and KUDZAI MASIIWA MAKASI
ROLANDO CUN v. DGNY GROUP INC. et al
as 2:2018cv14951
Plaintiff:
MARIO ROLANDO CUN
Defendant:
ALEXANDER DURAN and DGNY GROUP INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
ACOSTA v. National plumbing and Heating Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv10422
Defendant:
National plumbing and Heating Inc. and Jorge Carvalho
Plaintiff:
R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
SAIFULLIN v. PROCLEAN NJ INC et al
as 2:2018cv09077
Plaintiff:
ERIK SAIFULLIN
Defendant:
PROCLEAN NJ INC, PROCLEAN CLEANING SERVICES INC. and ALEXANDER BEDJANYAN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
