Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Dallas Engler et al v. Amazon.com Services LLC et al
as 8:2024cv00155
Petitioner:
Dallas Engler, Lucky Agustin and AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC;
Defendant:
Amazon.com Services LLC and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Marcelo et al v. Amazon.com,Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv07843
Plaintiff:
ELSON MARCELO, PETR BOGOPOLSKIY, JASON SALES and others
Defendant:
AMAZON.COM, INC., AMAZON LOGISTICS, INC. and Amazon.Com,Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Kryzhanovskiy v. Amazon.com Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv01292
Plaintiff:
Leilani Kryzhanovskiy
Defendant:
Amazon.com Services, Inc. and Amazon.com Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Escobar v. Amazon.com LLC et al
as 3:2021cv03391
Defendant:
Amazon Logistics, Inc., Amazon.com LLC and Global Forwarding Logistics, LLC
Plaintiff:
Dallan Escobar
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Huskey et al v. Amazon.com, LLC et al
as 2:2020cv01869
Plaintiff:
Sabrina Dennis and Roy Huskey, III
Defendant:
Amazon Logistics, Inc., Amazon.com, LLC and Synctruck, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Dennis et al v. Amazon.com, LLC et al
as 2:2020at00915
Plaintiff:
Sabrina Dennis and Roy Huskey, III
Defendant:
Amazon Logistics, Inc., Amazon.com, LLC and Synctruck, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Cano v. On Delivery Services, LLC et al
as 3:2018cv07142
Defendant:
Frisco Bay Transport, Ashley Furniture Industries, Inc., Ikea U.S. West, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Alfredo Cano
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Bravo v. On Delivery Services, LLC et al
as 3:2018cv01913
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Bravo
Defendant:
On Delivery Services, LLC , Jorge Alfaro, Frisco Bay Transport, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Carlos Morales v. Amazon.com, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv01981
Respondent:
Amazon.Com LLC and Peach, Inc.
Petitioner:
Carlos Morales
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
