Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Floyd v. Stryker Corporation
as 3:2022cv01131
Plaintiff:
Angela Floyd and Angelita Floyd
Defendant:
Stryker Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Shropshire v. Columbia Pipeline Group, Inc.
as 4:2020cv01189
Plaintiff:
Floyd Shropshire
Defendant:
Columbia Pipeline Group, Inc.
Brister v. Cheniere Energy, Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv01175
Defendant:
Midship Pipeline Co., LLC and Cheniere Energy, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Matthew Brister and Floyd Shropshire
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Floyd Franklin Trucking v. Montgomery Trucking Co., LLC
as 4:2019cv03642
Plaintiff:
Floyd Franklin Trucking
Defendant:
Montgomery Trucking Co., LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Floyd v. Kelly Services Inc
as 3:2018cv02247
Defendant:
Kelly Services Inc
Plaintiff:
Rebekah Floyd
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Floyd Roberson v. Chalk Mountain Services of Texas, LLC
as 5:2018cv00033
Defendant:
Chalk Mountain Services of Texas, LLC
Plaintiff:
Floyd Roberson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Wisnoskie v. Hydril Company
as 4:2016cv01184
Plaintiff:
Brad Wisnoskie, Jim Baxter, Floyd Guidry, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Hydril Company doing business as Tenaris Hydril
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Conway et al v. Henry Ranch LLC et al
as 5:2014cv00150
Plaintiff:
Deborah Sue Conway and Floyd "Skip" Conway
Defendant:
Beverly Henry Curci, James C Henry, James David Henry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Jeffrey v. Floyd et al
as 3:2014cv00509
Plaintiff:
Willie Jeffrey
Defendant:
Huey Floyd and HPF Contractors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Guillory v. PF&B Management, LP et al
as 4:2011cv04377
Plaintiff:
Fairley Guillory
Defendant:
PF&B Management, LP , PF&B Management GP, LLC , William H. Floyd and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
