Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Chhim v. City Of Houston et al
as 4:2023cv04850
Plaintiff:
Joseph Chhim
Defendant:
City Of Houston, Equal Employment Opportunity Commision, Rayford O Irvin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
GARCIA-ALVAREZ v. FOGO DE CHAO CHURRASCARIA (PITTSBURGH) LLC et al
as 4:2021cv00124
Defendant:
FOGO DE CHAO (HOLDINGS) INC., FOGO DE CHAO CHURRASCARIA (TROY) LLC, FOGO DE CHAO CHURRASCARIA (SAN ANTONIO) LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTIAN GARCIA-ALVAREZ
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Campbell et al v. Express Courier International, Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv00713
Plaintiff:
John Boswell, David Lumas, Calandra Banks and others
Defendant:
Express Courier International, Inc. and EMP LSO Holding Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Armstead v. Compass USA Group, Inc.
as 4:2017cv01145
Plaintiff:
Irvin Armstead
Defendant:
Compass Group USA, Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Foley v. Weimar Medical Holdings LLC d/b/a Weimer Medical Center et al
as 4:2016cv03663
Plaintiff:
Melvin Foley
Defendant:
Weimar Medical Holdings LLC d/b/a Weimer Medical Center, Price Family Capital Partners, LLC, Francis L Price and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Howard v. Crossmark, Inc.
as 4:2016cv00249
Plaintiff:
Irvin Howard
Defendant:
Crossmark, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Semiens v. MD Security, Inc. DBA Spartan et al
as 4:2013cv02294
Plaintiff:
Irvin Semiens
Defendant:
MD Security, Inc. DBA Spartan, David Fernandez and Daniel Fernandez
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Truman et al v. The National Groups, LLC et al
as 1:2013cv00303
Plaintiff:
Roni Carlson, Deborah Gonzales, Terence Irvine and others
Defendant:
National Collection & Loss Mitigation Services, LLC, National Default Servicing LLC, Mitchell Oringer and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
