Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Tsanas v. Eugenia LLC et al
as 1:2023cv01441
Plaintiff:
Athanasios Tsanas
Defendant:
Eugenia LLC and PHILIP DYONISIS HOBSON
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Diaz Rodriguez v. Eugenia LLC et al
as 1:2023cv01420
Plaintiff:
DENIS DIAZ RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
EUGENIA LLC, ALEXANDER HOBSON and PHILIP DYONISIS HOBSON
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Wilson et al v. Beaven et al
as 1:2016cv00990
Plaintiff:
Wells Wilson , Larry Lee , David Denardo and others
Defendant:
City of Alexandria, VA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bryner et al v. Harris et al
as 3:2013cv00034
Plaintiff:
Tim Bryner , Gregory Carter , Alfred P. Clark, Sr. and others
Defendant:
Roger L. Harris and County of Spotsylvania, Virginia
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Rogers et al v. City of Richmond, Virginia
as 3:2011cv00620
Plaintiff:
Stacy Rogers , Sean Adams , Reuben T. Albright and others
Defendant:
City of Richmond, Virginia
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Walker et al v. First Tee Transport, LLC
as 2:2009cv00499
Plaintiff:
Roger L. Walker, Roger L. Walker, James E. Argabright and others
Defendant:
First Tee Transport, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Moorefield et al v. C.A. Barrs Contractor, Inc. et al
as 4:2007cv00027
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Moorefield, Robert W. Moorefield, Robert W. Moorefield and others
Defendant:
C.A. Barrs Contractor, Inc., C.A. Barrs Contractor, Inc., C.A. Barrs Contractor, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Moorefield et al v. C.A. Barrs Contractor, Inc. et al
as 2:2007cv00107
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Moorefield, Philip M. Obey, Jr., Nicholas Crane and others
Defendant:
C.A. Barrs Contractor, Inc. and Michael S. St. Clair
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
