Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Carter v. Hydro-Stat Inc et al
as 0:2020cv62015
Defendant:
Hydro-Stat Inc and Dallas Nickels
Plaintiff:
Keith Carter
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Carter v. Hydro-Stat Inc et al
as 0:2020cv62016
Defendant:
Hydro-Stat Inc and Dallas Nickels
Plaintiff:
Keith Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Brawley Public Safety Employee Association et al v. City of Brawley et al
as 3:2019cv01891
Plaintiff:
Darlene Garcia, Daniel Schleyer, Brawley Public Safety Employee Association and others
Defendant:
City of Brawley and Does 1 Through 10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 fl
Reynoso v. Westville Restaurant, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv03431
Plaintiff:
Juan Reynoso
Defendant:
Westville Restaurant, Inc., Hurricane Strauss, Inc., Jay's Nickels and Dimes, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Rogers-Coxhead, Chad et al v. Glass Nickel Pizza Co.
as 3:2016cv00706
Plaintiff:
Chad Rogers-Coxhead and Shaun Taliaferro
Defendant:
Glass Nickel Pizza Co.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Ryan v. Funky Monkey, Inc. et al
as 6:2016cv00838
Plaintiff:
Daniel P. Ryan
Defendant:
Funky Monkey, Inc. and Edward L. Nickell
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Nickell, Eugene et al v. PGA Inc.
as 3:2016cv00202
Plaintiff:
Eugene Nickell , Eric Schilling and Blaine Krohn
Defendant:
PGA Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Nickel v. Right Choice Vending/Coffee, LLC
as 0:2015cv62548
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Nickel
Defendant:
Right Choice Vending/Coffee, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Nickel v. Peddlers Home Cooking #1, Inc., et al
as 1:2015cv00389
Plaintiff:
Sandra L. Nickel
Defendant:
Peddler's Home Cooking #1, Inc. , Cynthia Barnes and Glenda Rutledge
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Schiesser v. Store Marketing Associates, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv02526
Plaintiff:
Damian Schiesser
Defendant:
Store Marketing Associates, Inc. and Loren A. Nickel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
