Cases 1 - 10 of 209
Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund, Welfare Fund, Annuity Fund, and Apprenticeship, Journeyman Retraining, Educational and Industry Fund et al v. Baroco Contracting Corporation
as 1:2024cv01898
Petitioner:
Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund, Welfare Fund, Annuity Fund, and Apprenticeship, Journeyman Retraining, Educational and Industry Fund, Trustees Of The New York City Carpenters Relief and Charity Fund and The Carpenter Contractor Alliance of Metropolitan New York
Respondent:
Baroco Contracting Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
District Council No. 9 International Union of Painters and Allied Trades, A.F.L.- C.I.O. v. GG Painting Unlimited Corporation
as 1:2024cv01278
Petitioner:
District Council No. 9 Affiliated with International Union of Allied Painters and Allied Trades, A.F.L.-C.I.O. and District Council No. 9 International Union of Painters and Allied Trades, A.F.L.- C.I.O.
Respondent:
GG Painting Unlimited Corporation a/k/a G & G Painting Unlimited a/k/a GG Painting a/k/a GG Painting Unlimited a/k/a GG Painting & Unlimited Corp. a/k/a GG Maintenance Group LLC, GG Painting Unlimited Corporation, G & G Painting Unlimted, GG Painting and others
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Award
District Council No. 9 International Union of Painters and Allied Trades, A.F.L.-C.I.O. v. GG Painting Unlimited Corporation
as 1:2024cv01077
Petitioner:
District Council No. 9 International Union of Painters and Allied Trades, A.F.L.-C.I.O.
Respondent:
GG Painting Unlimited Corporation a/k/a G & G Painting Unlimited a/k/a GG Painting a/k/a GG Painting Unlimited a/k/a GG Painting & Unlimited Corp. a/k/a GG Maintenance Group LLC, GG Painting Unlimited Corporation, G & G Painting Unlimited, GG Painting and others
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Award
Vayani v. 146 West 29th Street Owners Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv00196
Plaintiff:
Abdul Khaliq Vayani
Defendant:
146 West 29th Street Owners Corporation, Berik Management, Managing 146 Building, President Rikin Sheth and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 fl Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
New York City and Vicinity District Council of Carpenters v. Tishman Construction Corporation of New York d/b/a AECOM/Tishman et al
as 1:2023cv03055
Petitioner:
New York City and Vicinity District Council of Carpenters
Respondent:
Tishman Construction Corporation of New York d/b/a AECOM/Tishman, Hunt Construction Group, Inc. d/b/a AECOM/Hunt, Tishman Construction Corporation of New York doing business as AECOM/TISHMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor: Suits by and against Labor Organizations
Local 553, International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United Metro Energy Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv02219
Plaintiff:
Local 553, International Brotherhood of Teamsters
Defendant:
United Metro Energy Corporation and United Apollo Petroleum Transportation Corp.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Bluelinx Corporation v. Truck Drivers Local Union No. 449 et al
as 1:2023cv00181
Plaintiff:
Bluelinx Corporation
Defendant:
Truck Drivers Local Union No. 449 and Eric Massenburg
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Hargraves v. Select Comfort Retail Corporation
as 5:2023cv00149
Plaintiff:
Ryan Hargraves
Defendant:
Select Comfort Retail Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Riverbay Corporation v. Service Employees International Union, Local 32BJ
as 1:2022cv10994
Counter Defendant:
Riverbay Corporation
Defendant:
SEIU Local 32BJ
Counter Claimant:
Service Employees International Union, Local 32BJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr Notice of Removal
Poor v. Starbucks Corporation
as 1:2022cv07255
Petitioner:
Teresa Poor
Respondent:
Starbucks Corporation
Interested Party:
Workers United, Justin Wooster, Joselyn Chuquillanqui and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
