Cases 1 - 6 of 6
BNSF Railway Company et al v. International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail and Transportation Workers - Transportation Division
as 4:2019cv00789
Plaintiff:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company, Union Pacific Railroad Company, The Belt Railway Company of Chicago and others
Defendant:
International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail and Transportation Workers - Transportation Division
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151
The Kansas City Southern Railway Company et al v. Brotherhood Of Locomotive Engineers And Trainmen et al
as 5:2018cv00071
Plaintiff:
The Kansas City Southern Railway Company and The Texas Mexican Railway Company
Defendant:
Brotherhood Of Locomotive Engineers And Trainmen and Chris Heise
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Carrejo v. Kansas City Southern Railway Company
as 5:2014cv00026
Plaintiff:
Frank Carrejo
Defendant:
Kansas City Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kansas City Southern Railway Company et al v. Brotherhood Of Locomotive Engineers And Trainmen et al
as 4:2010cv01572
Plaintiff:
Kansas City Southern Railway Company and The Texas-Mexican Railway Company
Defendant:
Brotherhood Of Locomotive Engineers And Trainmen and Pablo Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
BNSF Railway Company et al v. United Transportation Union and Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers & Trainmen
as 4:2009cv00376
Plaintiff:
BNSF Railway Company, BNSF Railway Company, BNSF Railway Company and others
Defendant:
United Transportation Union and Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers & Trainmen
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151 Railway Labor Act
The Kansas City Southern Railway Company et al v. Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen
as 6:2009cv00010
Plaintiff:
The Kansas City Southern Railway Company and The Texas-Mexican Railway Company
Defendant:
Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
