Cases 101 - 110 of 599
Bradshaw v. Mediavest Worldwide, Inc.
as 1:2022cv07231
Plaintiff:
Shadae Bradshaw
Defendant:
Mediavest Worldwide, Inc. d/b/a Spark Foundry
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 FMLA: Family and Medical Leave Act (Findings and Purposes)
Mineo v. Town of Hempstead et al
as 2:2022cv04092
Plaintiff:
Anthony Mineo
Defendant:
Town of Hempstead, John Rottkamp, John Novello and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Salati v. Northwell Health et al
as 2:2022cv03726
Plaintiff:
Michelle Salati
Defendant:
Northwell Health, South Shore University Hospital, Roseann Mignone and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Armstrong v. U.S. Legal Support, Inc.
as 1:2022cv03659
Plaintiff:
C. Armstrong
Defendant:
U.S. Legal Support, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
Henderson v. Geico et al
as 2:2022cv03513
Plaintiff:
Eva Henderson
Defendant:
Geico, Christopher Korkidis and Erin Stein
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Woods v. Medisca Inc. et al
as 8:2022cv00599
Plaintiff:
Kayla Woods
Defendant:
Medisca Inc., Larry Harney, Kayla Frenyea and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Gadit v. The Solomon Page Group, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv03875
Plaintiff:
Bilal Gadit
Defendant:
The Solomon Page Group, LLC and Signature Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Moses v. Richmond University Medical Center
as 1:2022cv02644
Plaintiff:
Joel Moses
Defendant:
Richmond University Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Mulhall v. Greystar Management Services, L.P.
as 1:2022cv03352
Plaintiff:
CAMELIA MULHALL
Defendant:
GREYSTAR MANAGEMENT SERVICES, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 fm Fed. Question: Family and Medical Leave Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
