Cases 91 - 100 of 221
Reaves v. BZB Multi-State LLC et al
as 3:2015cv00394
Defendant:
BZB Multi-State LLC, Joe Cyr, Vikki Dohnal and others
Plaintiff:
Antonio R. Reaves
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Rivas-Ayala v. Adelsheim Vineyard, LLC
as 3:2015cv00015
Defendant:
Adelsheim Vineyard, LLC
Plaintiff:
Javier Rivas-Ayala
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Cordova et al v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.
as 3:2014cv01663
Plaintiff:
Timothy Berg and Christopher Cordova
Defendant:
FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Tornabene v. Northwest Permanente, PC
as 3:2014cv01564
Defendant:
Northwest Permanente, PC
Plaintiff:
Kimberly A. Tornabene
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Makaneole v. Solarworld Industries America, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv01528
Defendant:
Kelly Services, Inc., Randstad Professionals US, LP, SolarWorld Industries America, LP and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Makaneole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Murphy v. Tuality Healthcare
as 3:2014cv01498
Plaintiff:
James M. Murphy
Defendant:
Tuality Healthcare
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4301 Uniformed Services Employment & Re-Employment Rights Act
Johnson v. United States
as 3:2014cv01435
Plaintiff:
Timm R. Johnson
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Wright v. Barrett Business Services, Inc.
as 6:2014cv01379
Defendant:
Barrett Business Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Brenna Wright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Radcliff v. United States
as 3:2014cv01304
Plaintiff:
Madonna Radcliff
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Syrop v. Whole Foods Markets of the Pacific Northwest
as 3:2014cv01293
Plaintiff:
Mr. Joshua Gabriel Syrop
Defendant:
Whole Foods Markets of the Pacific Northwest
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.