Cases 121 - 130 of 311
Lavengood v. Plymouth Tube Company USA
as 3:2013cv00618
Plaintiff:
Dennis Lavengood
Defendant:
Plymouth Tube Company USA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
BOOHER v. TOWN OF WHITESTOWN, INDIANA
as 1:2013cv00696
Plaintiff:
JOHN MICHAEL BOOHER
Defendant:
TOWN OF WHITESTOWN, INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
Cox v. Arcellor Mittal et al
as 2:2013cv00081
Plaintiff:
William Cox
Defendant:
Arcellor Mittal, Gerald Cook, Joseph Medellin and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
HART v. FORGE INDUSTRIAL STAFFING INC.
as 1:2013cv00094
Defendant:
FORGE INDUSTRIAL STAFFING INC.
Plaintiff:
JUANITA HART
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Baker v. Wilson 5 Service Company Inc
as 2:2013cv00005
Plaintiff:
John Baker
Defendant:
Wilson 5 Service Company Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
Baker v. Vera Bradley Inc
as 1:2012cv00455
Plaintiff:
Tracy Baker
Defendant:
Vera Bradley Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
BOWEN v. SODEXO, INC. et al
as 1:2012cv01859
Plaintiff:
MARY BOWEN
Defendant:
DOES ONE THROUGH FIVE, RICHARD JACKSON and SODEXO, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Hultgren v. Lake Central School Corporation
as 2:2012cv00518
Plaintiff:
William Hultgren
Defendant:
Lake Central School Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
PUTT v. MENARD, INC.
as 3:2012cv00187
Defendant:
MENARD, INC.
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM PUTT
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Hultgren v. Veracco et al
as 2:2012cv00478
Plaintiff:
Marylou Hultgren
Defendant:
Lawrence Veracco, Al Gandolfi, Patrick Hubbard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
