Cases 161 - 170 of 290
Kroger Limited Partnership I v. Local 400, United Food & Commercial Workers International Union
as 7:2012cv00386
Plaintiff:
Kroger Limited Partnership I
Defendant:
Local 400, United Food & Commercial Workers International Union
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Jackson v. Local Lodge 684 of the International Brotherhood of Boilermakers et al
as 2:2012cv00433
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Jackson
Defendant:
Local Lodge 684 of the International Brotherhood of Boilermakers and Mike Patterson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 160
Cokenour et al v. American Red Cross
as 1:2012cv00720
Plaintiff:
Michael Cokenour and Rebecca Cokenour
Defendant:
American Red Cross
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Tuli v. Global IT Inc.
as 1:2012cv00649
Plaintiff:
Gaurav Tuli
Defendant:
Global IT Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wade v. Argy, Wiltse & Robinson P.C. et al
as 1:2012cv00557
Plaintiff:
Christine J. Wade
Defendant:
Argy, Wiltse & Robinson P.C. and Eric Sobota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Handberg v. ASM Research, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00456
Plaintiff:
Michael Handberg
Defendant:
ASM Research, Inc., Jeri Lassiter and John Fraser
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McMurray v. AGC Flat Glass of North America, Inc.
as 1:2012cv00020
Defendant:
AGC Flat Glass of North America, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Hugh McMurray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Miller v. Next Day Blinds Corporation
as 1:2012cv00313
Plaintiff:
Linda Miller
Defendant:
Next Day Blinds Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lighthill v. Autotrader.com, Inc.
as 1:2012cv00262
Plaintiff:
Thomas Lighthill
Defendant:
Autotrader.com, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Sanchez et al v. Lasership, Inc.
as 1:2012cv00246
Plaintiff:
Manuel Milton Sanchez , Carmelo Medina and Gerard Edmond
Defendant:
Lasership, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
