Cases 51 - 60 of 1,497
Macaluso v. Tantillo Auto Group, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv09519
Plaintiff:
Peter Macaluso
Defendant:
Tantillo Auto Group, LLC, Raymond Tantillo, Thomas Cunningham and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Morris v. CareCentrix. Inc.
as 1:2023cv08282
Plaintiff:
Darlene Morris
Defendant:
CareCentrix. Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Weir v. C&B Delivery LLC et al
as 2:2023cv09097
Plaintiff:
Alonzo Weir
Defendant:
C&B Delivery LLC doing business as Temco Logistics, Home Express Delivery Service, LLC doing business as Temco Logistics and Temco Logistics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Troeger v. JetBlue Airways Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv10859
Plaintiff:
Chadwick Troeger
Defendant:
JetBlue Airways Corporation, William Petersen, Wayne Jr. Mayers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Springett v. Regal Cinemas, Inc.
as 3:2023cv01401
Plaintiff:
Joshua Springett
Defendant:
Regal Cinemas, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Cracchiola v. Motorola Solutions, Inc.
as 1:2023cv01128
Plaintiff:
Rachel Cracchiola
Defendant:
Motorola Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Ophir v. Koneksa Health Inc et al
as 1:2023cv09145
Plaintiff:
Gol Ophir
Defendant:
Koneksa Health Inc and Chris Benko
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Rakowicz et al v. ABM Industry Groups, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv09254
Plaintiff:
Waldemar Rakowicz, Roman Karwan, Adam Koniarz and others
Defendant:
ABM Industry Groups, LLC and UG2 LLC
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Goudelias v. Secrist Marketing Strategies, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv08928
Plaintiff:
ELENA GOUDELIAS
Defendant:
SECRIST MARKETING STRATEGIES, LLC doing business as BKA CONTENT, PHIL SECRIST and CARA SECRIST
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.