Cases 1 - 7 of 7
I. Artiga v. ABM Industry Groups, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv06735
Counter Defendant:
I. Artiga and Roes
Interested Party:
State Street Corporation, ABM Industries Incorporated, FMR, LLC and others
Defendant:
ABM Industry Groups, LLC, Doe One through and including Doe Ten and Doe
Plaintiff:
Isabel Artiga, Gabriel Rodriguez, Jessica Sheehan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Vardan Karapetyan v. ABM Industries Incorporated et al
as 2:2015cv08313
Defendant:
ABM Industries Incorporated, ABM Security Services Inc and Does
Plaintiff:
Vardan Karapetyan
Marley Castro, et al v. ABM Industries Incorporated, et al
as 15-16627
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MARLEY CASTRO and LUCIA MARMOLEJO
Defendant / Appellant:
ABM INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED, ABM JANITORIAL SERVICES, INC., ABM ONSITE SERVICES - WEST, INC. and others
Castro v. ABM Industries Incorporated et al
as 4:2014cv05359
Plaintiff:
Marley Castro
Defendant:
ABM Industries Incorporated , ABM Janitorial Services, Inc. and ABM Onsite Services - West, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Vardan Karapetyan v. ABM Industries Incorporated et al
as 2:2014cv09354
Defendant:
ABM Industries Incorporated, ABM Security Services, Inc. and Does
Plaintiff:
Vardan Karapetyan
Carlos Villacres v. ABM Industries Incorporated, et al
as 09-55864
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARLOS VILLACRES, individually and on behalf of other members of the general public similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
ABM INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED, a Delaware corporation, ABM SECURITY SERVICES, INC., a California corporation and SSA SECURITY, INC., a North Carolina corporation
Carlos Villacres v. ABM Industries Incorporated et al
as 2:2007cv05327
Plaintiff:
Carlos Villacres, Carlos Villacres and Carlos Villacres
Defendant:
ABM Industries Incorporated, ABM Security Services Inc, Security Services America Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.