Cases 1 - 10 of 1,679
Hopkins v. Capital One
as 4:2024cv00240
Plaintiff:
Tanaj Hopkins
Defendant:
Capital One
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Hanley v. The Kroger Co. et al
as 3:2024cv01197
Plaintiff:
Melandi Hanley
Defendant:
The Kroger Co. and Kroger Loyalty Fulfillment Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Pintor v. US Foods, Inc.
as 5:2024cv00120
Plaintiff:
Christian R. Pintor
Defendant:
US Foods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Merrill v. McKinney Independent School District et al
as 4:2024cv00442
Plaintiff:
Kalei Merrill
Defendant:
Mitchell Curry, Melinda Defelice, Tamaria Griffin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Calla v. Ortiz et al
as 3:2024cv00159
Plaintiff:
Mr Anthony Nicolas Calla
Defendant:
Mr. Isaac Ortiz and Ms. Maryne P Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0141 Labor Management Relations Act of 1947
Davis v. CenterPoint Energy, Inc
as 4:2024cv01019
Plaintiff:
Krystle Davis
Defendant:
CenterPoint Energy, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Sesami Cash Management Technologies Corp et al v. Cennox Inc
as 3:2024cv00673
Plaintiff:
Sesami Cash Management Technologies Corp., ARCA. TECH Systems, LLC, Sesami Cash Management Technologies Corp and others
Defendant:
Cennox, Inc. and Cennox Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Bell v. City of Teague
as 6:2024cv00147
Plaintiff:
Theresa Bell
Defendant:
City of Teague
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Sanchez et al v. City of Corpus Christi, Texas
as 2:2024cv00106
Plaintiff:
Teofilo Sanchez, Amanda Guerra and Cody Scott
Defendant:
City of Corpus Christi, Texas
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Galia v. Roundglass, LLC
as 1:2024cv00468
Plaintiff:
Erica Galia
Defendant:
Roundglass, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
