Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 76
Central States Southeast And Southwest Areas Pension Fund et al v. Charles M. Armstrong et al
as 1:2022cv06994
Plaintiff: Central States Southeast And Southwest Areas Pension Fund and Charles A. Whobrey
Defendant: Charles M. Armstrong, Charles M. Armstrong Living Trust, Charles M. Armstrong and Brian Daniell, trustees of the Charles M. Armstrong Living Trust and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1451 E.R.I.S.A.
Bolton et al v. Inland Fresh Seafood Corporation of America, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv04602
Plaintiff: Rani Bolton, Alison Mercker, James Armstrong and others
Defendant: Inland Fresh Seafood Corporation of America, Inc., Joel Knox, Bill Demmond and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Board of Trustees of the IBEW/NECA Sound & Communications Health & Welfare Trust Fund et al v. Streamline Integration et al
as 3:2022cv05342
Plaintiff: Board of Trustees of the IBEW/NECA Sound & Communications Health & Welfare Trust Fund, IBEW Ninth District Pension Trust, Northern California Joint Apprenticeship and Training Trust and others
Defendant: Streamline Integration and Brian Thomas Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Benefits
The Construction Industry Retirement Fund of Rockford, Illinois v. J.D. Schell, Ltd.
as 3:2022cv50132
Plaintiff: The Construction Industry Retirement Fund of Rockford, Illinois
Defendant: J.D. Schell, Ltd., d/b/a Armstrong Heating & Cooling and J.D. Schell, Ltd. doing business as Armstrong Heating & Cooling
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Employee Pension Plan
Ulery v. West Monroe Partners, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00781
Plaintiff: Nathan A Ulery and Matthew Daly
Defendant: West Monroe Partners, Inc., Kevin McCarty, Bolger Tom and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1104 Recovery of Benefits to Employee
Pipe Fitters' Retirement Fund et al v. Diversified General Contractors, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00594
Plaintiff: Local 597 Pipe Fitters' Retirement Fund, Local 597 Pipe Fitters' Welfare Fund, Local 597 Pipe Fitters' Training Fund and others
Defendant: Diversified General Contractors, Inc. and Melvin Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Plan et al v. Streamline Integration et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv06261
Plaintiff: Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Plan, Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Defined Contribution Trust Fund, Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Health Trust Fund and others
Defendant: Streamline Integration a California corporation doing business as Streamline System Designs and Brian Thomas Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Plan et al v. DVBE Electric, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2021cv01267
Plaintiff: Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Plan, Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Defined Contribution Trust Fund, Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Health Trust Fund and others
Defendant: DVBE Electric, Inc. and Brian Thomas Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
Farah et al v. Emirates et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv05786
Plaintiff: KAYENAT FARAH, JOSEPH CAMMARATA, Charlotte Armstrong and others
Defendant: Emirates and Emirates Severance Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Pipe Fitters' Welfare Fund, Local 597 et al v. Diversified General Contractors, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00942
Plaintiff: Pipe Fitters' Training Fund, Local 597, Pipe Fitting Council of Greater Chicago, Pipe Fitters' Retirement Fund, Local 597 and others
Defendant: Diversified General Contractors, Inc. and Melvin Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?