Cases 11 - 18 of 18
JACKSON v. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
as 1:2012cv00182
Plaintiff:
KEVIN JACKSON
Defendant:
UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Arambula et al v. Karl Schmidt Unisia Inc Zollner Division Hourly Pension Plan et al
as 1:2011cv00429
Plaintiff:
Louis Arambula , Tony Chacon , John Cox and others
Defendant:
Karl Schmidt Unisia Inc Zollner Division Hourly Pension Plan and Karl Schmidt Unisia Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Perl et al v. Laux/Arnold Incorporated et al
as 1:2011cv00238
Plaintiff:
Dave M Perl , Kevin Glave , Scott Foltz and others
Defendant:
Laux/Arnold Incorporated , L-A Electric Employee Benefit Program , William Arnold and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
COPE et al v. SCHWER ELECTRIC COMPANY, LLC
as 1:2011cv00654
Plaintiff:
KEVIN COPE and INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL UNION NO. 855 MONEY PURCHASE PENSION PLAN
Defendant:
SCHWER ELECTRIC COMPANY, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
YORK v. SICKNESS & ACCIDENT DISABILITY BENEFIT PLAN/ AT&T DISABILITY PLAN
as 1:2008cv01201
Plaintiff:
KEVIN YORK
Defendant:
SICKNESS & ACCIDENT DISABILITY BENEFIT PLAN/ AT&T DISABILITY PLAN
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
ZEHNER v. DALLAS SERVICE CENTER et al
as 4:2008cv00046
Plaintiff:
KEVIN D. ZEHNER
Defendant:
DALLAS SERVICE CENTER, DALLAS SERVICE CENTER, KATHRYN AMOS and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bechtel v. Office Max
as 3:2007cv00196
Plaintiff:
Kevin Bechtel
Defendant:
Office Max
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
ROBBINS v. MILLIMAN USA LONG TERM DISABILITY INSURANCE PLAN et al
as 1:2007cv00248
Plaintiff:
KEVIN ROBBINS
Defendant:
MILLIMAN USA LONG TERM DISABILITY INSURANCE PLAN, MILLIMAN USA LONG TERM DISABILITY INSURANCE PLAN, THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
