Cases 1 - 8 of 8
W. et al v. Providence Health Plan et al
as 3:2022cv00428
Plaintiff:
Mr. Chris W. and Ms. Jennifer W.
Defendant:
Providence Health Plan, Blue Cross of California doing business as Anthem Blue Cross, Providence Health & Services doing business as Providence and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A
Tooley v. Blue Mountain Networks, LLC et al
as 2:2021cv00457
Defendant:
Eastern Oregon Telecom, LLC and Blue Mountain Networks, LLC
Plaintiff:
Robert Tooley
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Rizzo v. Novartis Corporation Welfare Benefits Plan et al
as 3:2019cv01054
Defendant:
Novartis Corporation Welfare Benefits Plan, Horizon Healthcare Services, Inc. dba Horizon Blue Cross Blue Shield of New Jersey and Horizon Healthcare Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth A Rizzo
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Rizzo v. Novartis Corporation Welfare Benefits Plan et al
as 3:2019cv01012
Defendant:
Novartis Corporation Welfare Benefits Plan and Horizon Healthcare Services, Inc. dba Horizon Blue Cross Blue Shield of New Jersey
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth A. Rizzo
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Kelly v. Regence Blue Cross Blue Shield of Oregon
as 3:2017cv01779
Plaintiff:
William Kelly
Defendant:
Regence Blue Cross Blue Shield of Oregon
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Kelly v. Regence Blue Cross Blue Shield of Oregon
as 0:2017cv01779
Plaintiff:
William Kelly
Defendant:
Regence Blue Cross Blue Shield of Oregon
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Metcalf v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan et al
as 3:2011cv01305
Defendant:
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan, Daimler Truck N.A. LLC UAW Health Benefits Plan and Daimler-Chrysler North America
Plaintiff:
Robert Metcalf
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
Crowell v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Illinois
as 3:2010cv00249
Defendant:
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
