Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 1 - 10 of 47
Young v. UNUM GROUP et al
as 1:2024cv00109
Plaintiff: Colleen A. Young
Defendant: UNUM GROUP, UNUM Life Insurance Company of America, Community Health Systems and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
WIEDERHOLD v. RES-CARE, INC. d/b/a BRIGHTSRPING HEALTH SERVICES a/k/a NORMAL LIFE, INC.
as 4:2024cv00003
Plaintiff: MINDA D. WIEDERHOLD
Defendant: RES-CARE, INC. d/b/a Brightspring Health Services a/k/a Normal Life, Inc. and RES-CARE, INC. d/b/a BRIGHTSRPING HEALTH SERVICES a/k/a NORMAL LIFE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties
BICARD v. TOWNE CENTRE ASSISTED LIVING D/B/A WYNDMOOR SENIOR LIVING COMMUNITY et al
as 2:2023cv00499
Plaintiff: Fabian Bicard
Defendant: Towne Centre Assisted Living dba Wyndmoor Senior Living Community, UNITED OF OMAHA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and TOWNE CENTRE ASSISTED LIVING D/B/A WYNDMOOR SENIOR LIVING COMMUNITY
Cross Defendant: Michael Meiners and Blue Water Insurance, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
MEREDITH'S INC., D/B/A SAVERSYSTEMS, AS SPONSOR OF THE SAVERSYSTEMS EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN et al v. MILLER et al
as 1:2023cv01877
Plaintiff: MEREDITH'S INC., D/B/A SAVERSYSTEMS, AS SPONSOR OF THE SAVERSYSTEMS EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN and SAVERSYSTEMS EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNSERSHIP PLAN ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE, AS PLAN ADMINISTRATOR
Defendant: MICHAEL S. MILLER, JOHN MEREDITH and DAVID BARNES
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
INDIANA/KENTUCKY/OHIO REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS PENSION FUND et al v. INDUSTRIAL CONTRACTORS & ENGINEERS, INC. d/b/a ICE SCAFFOLDING et al
as 1:2023cv01840
Plaintiff: INDIANA/KENTUCKY/OHIO REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS PENSION FUND, INDIANA STATE COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS PENSION FUND, INDIANA/KENTUCKY/OHIO REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS DEFINED CONTRIBUTION PENSION FUND and others
Defendant: INDUSTRIAL CONTRACTORS & ENGINEERS, INC. doing business as ICE Scaffolding, JOHN STOFKO, STOTEN STOFKO and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
RHOADES et al v. CERVANTES
as 1:2023cv01333
Plaintiff: MATT RHOADES and INDIANA STATE COUNCIL OF PLASTERERS AND CEMENT MASONS HEALTH AND WELFARE AND PENSION FUNDS
Defendant: RUDY CERVANTES d/b/a MODERN FLOOR COVERING
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Waddles v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
as 1:2023cv00220
Plaintiff: Ronald Waddles
Defendant: Metropolitan Life Insurance Company d/b/a MetLife Disability and Metropolitan Life Insurance Company doing business as Metlife Disability
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal-ERISA
LOBODOCKY, et al v. MEDXCEL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00767
Plaintiff: VICKI L LOBODOCKY
Defendant: MEDXCEL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT, LLC, THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA and ASCENSION HEALTH ALLIANCE D/B/A ASCENSION
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
KNOWLES et al v. FETTERS CONSTRUCTION, INC. et al
as 1:2022cv02413
Plaintiff: STEPHEN KNOWLES, TRUSTEE, BRICKLAYERS OF INDIANA RETIREMENT PLAN, BRICKLAYERS & TROWEL TRADES INTERNATIONAL PENSION FUND and others
Defendant: FETTERS CONSTRUCTION, INC. and FETTERS CONSTRUCTION, INC. d/b/a FCI CONSTRUCTION
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE, et al. v. MILLER et al
as 1:2022cv02123
Plaintiff: ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE, AS PLAN ADMINISTRATOR OF THE PRUDENTIAL MERGED RETIREMENT PLAN and THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE and PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Defendant: DENNIS E MILLER, ESTATE OF ELIZABETH M. MILLER, THOMAS B GOSSETT and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?