Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Sawyers v. Mo-Kan Teamsters Pension Plan et al
as 2:2017cv02346
Plaintiff:
George Ray Sawyers
Defendant:
Mo-Kan Teamsters Pension Plan and Board of Trustees of the Mo-Kan Teamsters Pension Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109
Construction Industry Laborers Pension Fund et al v. Explosive Contractors, Inc.
as 2:2012cv02624
Plaintiff:
Construction Industry Laborers Pension Fund , Mark R. Nidiffer , Kevin Fahey and others
Defendant:
Explosive Contractors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Construction Industry Laborers Pension Fund et al v. O'Donnell-Way Construction Company, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv02088
Plaintiff:
Construction Industry Laborers Pension Fund , Mark R. Nidiffer , Kevin Fahey and others
Defendant:
O'Donnell-Way Construction Company, Inc. and OW Construction, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Abbott v. Sprint Nextel Corporation et al
as 2:2011cv02572
Plaintiff:
Jesse F. Yarger, Frances Junann Smith, Miriam F. Jeralds and others
Defendant:
Sprint Communications, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Graphic Communications Conference of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters National Pension Fund et al v. Greystone Graphics, Inc.
as 2:2011cv02296
Plaintiff:
Graphic Communications Conference of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters National Pension Fund , George Tedeschi and Malcolm Pritzker
Defendant:
Greystone Graphics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
Fulghum et al v. Embarq Corporation et al
as 2:2007cv02602
Plaintiff:
Faye P. Abbott, Judith R. Adams, Lois J. Ainley and others
Defendant:
Carolina Telephone and Telegraph Company Voluntary Employees' Beneficiary Association Sickness Death, Carolina Telephone and Telegraph Company, LLC, Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Embarq Corporation as Plan Administrator of the and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
