Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Cahill v. The United States of America et al
as 1:2023cv13899
Plaintiff:
Patrick Sean Cahill
Defendant:
The United States of America, Central Intelligence Agency, Dept of Defense and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Baumeister et al v. Exelon Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv06505
Plaintiff:
Fred Baumeister, Kenneth Berkeihiser, Dwayne Clauser and others
Defendant:
Exelon Corporation, Investment Oversight Committee, Board of Directors of Exelon Corporation and others
Amicus Curiae:
U.S. Chamber of Commerce and Amicus Curiae the Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Luckett v. Wintrust Financial Corp. et al
as 1:2022cv03968
Plaintiff:
Lynetta Luckett
Defendant:
Wintrust Financial Corporation, The Board of Trustees of Wintrust Financial Corp., The Administrative Committee of the Wintrust Financial Corp. Retirement Savings Plan and others
Amicus Curiae:
Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, American Benefits Council, ERISA Industry Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1104 Recovery of Benefits to Employee
In re Broiler Chicken Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2016cv08637
Plaintiff:
Maplevale Farms, Inc., Big Y Foods, Inc., Steve Mizera and others
Defendant:
Koch Foods, Inc, Claxton Poultry Farms, Inc., Amick Farms, LLC and others
Respondent:
R.W. Zant Co.
Petitioner:
Amigos Meat Distributors, LP, The Golub Corporation, The Distribution Group, Inc. (d/b/a Van Eerden Foodservice Company) and others
Special Master:
Maura R. Grossman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Roofers' Pension Fund et al v. United States of America Roofing, Inc.
as 1:2010cv03049
Plaintiff:
Roofers' Pension Fund , Roofers' Unions Welfare Trust Fund , Chicagoland Roofers' Apprenticeship and Training Fund and others
Defendant:
United States of America Roofing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
