Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Weinstock v. Rite Aid Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv00628
Plaintiff: Inez Weinstock
Defendant: Rite Aid Corporation and Prudential Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv01421
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Hodge v. All American School Bus Corp. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv01366
Defendant: Benjamin Fishoff, Howard Belford, Martin Katz and others
Plaintiff: Alexi Arias, Albert E. Percy, Percy Jobs and Careers Corporation an IRC 501(c)(3) non- profit, as Class Representative, and others
Respondent: James M. Kernan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Bay Park Center for Nursing & Rehabilitation LLC et. al. v. Philipson et. al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv06291
Defendant: Donna Hodge, Annette Hall, Karen Grant Williams and Alexi Arias, Deborah Philipson, Avi Philipson and others
Plaintiff: Bay Park Center for Nursing & Re abilitation LLC d/b/a Bay Park Center for Nursing & Rehabilitation LLC, Brookhaven Rehabilitation & Heath Care Center LLC d/b/a Brookhaven Rehabilitation & Health Care Center LLC,, South Point Plaza Nursing and Rehabilitation Center doing business as Bayview Manor LLC and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: Oriska Corporation, and Oriska Corporation
Intervenor Defendant: Home Attendant Services of Hyde Park, New Carlton Rehab & Nursing Center, Prokeep Inc. and others
Respondent: James M. Kernan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
BOILERMAKERS NATIONAL HEALTH AND WELFARE TRUST et al v. STEELE et al
as 2:2010cv02708
Plaintiff: BOILERMAKERS NATIONAL HEALTH AND WELFARE TRUST and BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE BOILERMAKERS NATIONAL HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND
Defendant: JUDITH A. STEELE , TIMOTHY STEELE , FELDMAN, SHEPHERD, WOHLGELERNTER, TANNER, WEINSTOCK AND DODIG and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Boilermakers National Health and Welfare Trust et al v. Steele et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv02329
Plaintiff: Boilermakers National Health and Welfare Trust, Boilermakers National Health and Welfare Trust, Boilermakers National Health and Welfare Trust and others
Defendant: Judith A. Steele, Timothy Steele, Feldman, Shepherd, Wohlgelernter, Tanner, Weinstock and Dodig and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Type: Labor None
Clement Battoni, et al v. IBEW Local Union 102 Empl Pens, et al
as 09-2030
Plaintiff - Appellee: CLEMENT BATTONI, RAYMOND GIULIANO, JAMES W. VREELAND and others
Defendant - Appellant: IBEW LOCAL UNION 102 EMPL PENSION PLAN, IBEW LOCAL UNION 102 EMPL WELFARE FUND, JOHN E. MCHUGH and others
Ronald Tomasko v. Ira H Weinstock PC, et al
as 08-4673
Plaintiff - Appellee: RONALD T. TOMASKO
Defendant - Appellant: IRA H WEINSTOCK PC, as Administrator of the Ira H. Weinstock, P.C. Money Purchase Pension Plan and Ira H. Weinstock P.C. Profit Sharing Plan and IRA H. WEINSTOCK, as Trustee of the Ira H. Weinstock, P.C. Money Purchase Pension Plan and Ira H. Weinstock, P.C. profit Sharing Plan and individually
Clement Battoni, et al v. IBEW Local Union 102 Empl Pens, et al
as 08-3924
Plaintiff - Appellant: CLEMENT BATTONI, NEIL BATTONI, RAYMOND S. DEMARCO, JR. and others
Defendant - Appellee: REGINA DELESKY, IBEW LOCAL UNION 102 EMPL PENSION PLAN, IBEW LOCAL UNION 102 EMPL WELFARE FUND and others
Clement Battoni, et al v. IBEW Local Union 102 Empl Pens, et al
as 08-3743
Plaintiff - Appellee: CLEMENT BATTONI, NEIL BATTONI, RAYMOND S. DEMARCO, JR. and others
Defendant - Appellant: IBEW LOCAL UNION 102 EMPL PENSION PLAN, IBEW LOCAL UNION 102 EMPL WELFARE FUND, JOHN E. MCHUGH and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?