Cases 51 - 60 of 88
Goldsberry v. Trinity University Press et al
as 3:2011cv00266
Plaintiff:
Leon Goldsberry
Defendant:
Trinity University Press , Vaughn Sills and John Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Patrick Collins, Inc. v. John Does 1-5
as 2:2011cv00153
Plaintiff:
Patrick Collins, Inc.
Defendant:
John Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Patrick Collins, Inc. v. John Does 1-5
as 1:2011cv01273
Defendant:
John Does 1-5
Plaintiff:
Patrick Collins, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Patrick Collins, Inc. v. Does 1-5
as 1:2011cv20909
Plaintiff:
Patrick Collins, Inc.
Defendant:
John Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101
Patrick Collins, Inc. v. John Does 1-5
as 1:2011cv01272
Defendant:
John Does 1-5
Plaintiff:
Patrick Collins, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
PATRICK COLLINS, INC. v. JOHN DOES 1-5
as 2:2011cv01486
Plaintiff:
PATRICK COLLINS, INC.
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-5
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Narkiewicz-Laine v. Doyle et al
as 1:2011cv01826
Plaintiff:
Christian K Narkiewicz-Laine
Defendant:
Kevin C Doyle , Michael W Doyle , Pamela Doyle and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Alpine business group, Inc. v. Sabathia et al
as 1:2011cv00934
Plaintiff:
Alpine business group, inc.
Defendant:
Amber Sabathia , Matthew Wallwork , John does 1-5, individuals and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
HANOVER ARCHITECTURAL SERVICE, P.A. v. CHRISTIAN TESTIMONY-MORRIS, N.P. et al
as 2:2010cv05455
Plaintiff:
HANOVER ARCHITECTURAL SERVICE, P.A.
Defendant:
CHRISTIAN TESTIMONY-MORRIS, N.P., VISBEEN CONSTRUCTION CO., D.P., PETER RAYMOND WELLS, ARCHITECT, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
ALPINE BUSINESS GROUP, INC. v. SABATHIA et al
as 2:2010cv04850
Plaintiff:
ALPINE BUSINESS GROUP, INC.
Defendant:
AMBER SABATHIA, 40/40 CLUB, INC., MATTHEW WALLWORK and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
