Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Scott Pomerantz v. Tristram Buckley et al
as 2:2022cv09163
Plaintiff:
Scott Pomerantz an individual doing business as Law Office of Scott Pomerantz
Defendant:
Tristram Buckley and Does 1 through 5, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Ashley Ortega v. Alfredo Villa
as 2:2020cv11361
Defendant:
Alfredo Villa and Does 1 through 5 inclusive
Plaintiff:
Ashley Orega
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Werner et al v. Sell It Social, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv10624
Defendant:
Heath Wolfson, Sell It Social, LLC, DOES 1 through 5, inclusive and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffery R. Werner, Incredible Features, Inc. and Brian R. Wolff
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Fox Television Stations LLC et al v. BarryDriller Content Systems Plc et al
as 2:2012cv06921
Plaintiff:
Fox Television Stations Inc, Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation, Fox Broadcasting Company Inc and others
Defendant:
BarryDriller Content Systems Plc, Does 1 through 5 inclusive, Barry Driller Inc. and others
Counter Claimant:
FilmOn X, LLC, FilmOn.com, INC and FilmOn.TV Networks, INC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
E-Z Lettering Service v. Nationwide Pennant and Flag Manufacturing Inc et al
as 8:2008cv00368
Plaintiff:
E-Z Lettering Service and E-Z Lettering Service
Defendant:
Nationwide Pennant and Flag Manufacturing Inc and Does 1 through 5, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
FLUFF, INC. v. WORLD ACCORDING TO JESS LLC et al
as 2:2008cv00309
Plaintiff:
FLUFF, INC.
Defendant:
WORLD ACCORDING TO JESS LLC, JESSICA ALPERT-GOLDMAN and DOES 1 THROUGH 5, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Fluff, Inc. v. Madeline Beth Designs et al
as 2:2008cv00249
Plaintiff:
Fluff, Inc. and Fluff, Inc.
Defendant:
Madeline Beth Designs, Madeline Beth and Does 1 through 5, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
