Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Craig A. Matheny v. Lin Shuying et al
as 8:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
Craig A. Matheny
Defendant:
Lin Shuying, Jane Does and John Does
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Wright v. Doe et al
as 3:2022cv01200
Plaintiff:
Jon Q Wright
Defendant:
Miss Jane Doe and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101 Copyright Infringement (definitions)
Wright v. Doe et al
as 3:2022cv01195
Plaintiff:
Jon Q Wright
Defendant:
Miss Jane Doe and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101 Copyright Infringement (definitions)
Nexon America Inc et al v. John Does 1-9 et al
as 5:2021cv00886
Defendant:
JOHN AND OR JANE DOES, John Does 1-9, John Does 10-50 and others
Plaintiff:
Nexon America Inc and Nexon Korea Corporation
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Constantino Basile v. The Los Angeles Film School, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv08604
Defendant:
Lana Wachowski, Warner Bros. Entertainment, Inc., Blake Lively and others
Plaintiff:
Constantino Basile
Petitioner:
City of Beverly Hills, a public entity, erroneously sued and served herein as Beverly Hills Police Department
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Tresona Multimedia, LLC v. Burbank High School Vocal Music Association et al
as 2:2016cv04781
Defendant:
Burbank High School Vocal Music Association, Brett Carroll, John Doe Carroll and others
Plaintiff:
Tresona Multimedia, LLC
Sweet People Apparel Inc v. Chang Group LLC et al
as 2:2016cv03139
Defendant:
Chang Group LLC, John and Jane Does, Kenco Fashion Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Sweet People Apparel Inc
Constantino Basile v. Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc, et al
as 2:2015cv05243
Plaintiff:
Constantino Basile
Defendant:
David S. Goyer, John Jane Does, Legendary Pictures and others
Sweet People Apparel, Inc. et al v. Watch L.A. Jeans & Sportswear et al
as 2:2014cv07399
Defendant:
John and Jane Does, Pierre D. Mitri, Watch L.A. Jeans & Sportswear and others
Plaintiff:
RCRV, Inc. and Sweet People Apparel, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
