Patent Cases filed in Connecticut
Cases 91 - 100 of 436
Conair Corporation v. Zadro Products, Inc.
as 3:2015cv01424
Defendant: Zadro Products, Inc.
Plaintiff: Conair Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Novitaz, Inc. v. InMarket Media, LLC
as 3:2016cv00387
Plaintiff: Novitaz, Inc.
Defendant: InMarket Media, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Hawk Technology Systems, LLC v. St. Vincent's Medical Center
as 3:2016cv00196
Plaintiff: Hawk Technology Systems, LLC
Defendant: St. Vincent's Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Fletcher-Terry Company, LLC v. Alfa Automation U.S.A. Inc.
as 3:2016cv00106
Plaintiff: Fletcher-Terry Company, LLC
Defendant: Alfa Automation U.S.A. Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Edgewell Personal Care Brands, LLC et al v. Munchkin, Inc.
as 3:2016cv00094
Plaintiff: Edgewell Personal Care Brands, LLC and International Refills Company Ltd.
Defendant: Munchkin, Inc
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
Man-Q Corp. v. Conair Corp.
as 3:2016cv00091
Plaintiff: Man-Q Corp.
Defendant: Conair Corp
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Evans Cooling Systems, Inc. v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00032
Plaintiff: Evans Cooling Systems, Inc.
Defendant: Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. and Audi of America, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
StormTech LLC et al v. Cultec, Inc
as 3:2015cv01890
Plaintiff: StormTech LLC and Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc.
Defendant: Cultec, Inc
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Chapco, Inc. et al v. Woodway USA, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv01665
Plaintiff: Chapco, Inc. and Samsara, LLC
Defendant: Woodway USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Hawk Technology Systems, LLC v. Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc
as 3:2015cv01619
Plaintiff: Hawk Technology Systems, LLC
Defendant: Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?