Patent Cases filed in Tennessee
Cases 11 - 17 of 17
EmeraChem Holdings, LLC v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2014cv00132
Plaintiff: EmeraChem Holdings, LLC
Defendant: Volkswagen Group of America, Inc , Volkswagen AG and Volkswagen Group of America Chattanooga Operations, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
J-Channel Industries Corp. v. Ykk-Ap America, Inc. (TV1)
as 3:2013cv00619
Plaintiff: J-Channel Industries Corporation
Defendant: YKK AP America, Inc.
Counter_claimant: YKK AP America, Inc.
Counter_defendant: J-Channel Industries Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
B.E. Technology, L.L.C. v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
as 2:2012cv02825
Plaintiff: B.E. Technology, L.L.C.
Defendant: Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Wirtgen America, Inc. v. Roadtec, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv00729
Plaintiff: Wirtgen America, Inc.
Defendant: Roadtec, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0101
Karl Storz Endoscopy-America, Inc. v. Stryker, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2007cv02702
Plaintiff: Karl Storz Endoscopy-America, Inc. and Karl Storz Endoscopy-America, Inc.
Defendant: Stryker, Inc., Stryker Communications, Inc. and Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Sullivan Research Incorporated v. Olympus Corporation et al
as 3:2007cv00172
Plaintiff: Sullivan Research Incorporated and Sullivan Research Incorporated
Defendant: Olympus Corporation, Olympus Medical Systems Corp., Olympus America, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Wirtgen America Inc v. Caterpillar, Inc., et al
as 3:2004cv00788
Plaintiff: Wirtgen America, Inc.
Defendant: Caterpillar, Inc., Caterpillar Paving Products Inc. and Bitelli, S.P.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?