Cases 61 - 70 of 1,445
Locke v. Under Secretary of Commerce of Intellectual Property et al
as 1:2023cv01288
Plaintiff:
Wendell Terry Locke
Defendant:
Under Secretary of Commerce of Intellectual Property and Director of the USPTO
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1071 Appeal of Decision of U.S. Patent & Trademark Office
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2023cv01569
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2023cv01532
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Houweling Intellectual Properties, Inc. et al v. BFF Louisa 1 LLC
as 3:2023cv00046
Plaintiff:
Houweling Intellectual Properties, Inc. and Beheer 141 B.V. a Dutch Company doing business as Kubo
Defendant:
BFF Louisa 1 LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2023cv01497
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
LifeNet Health v. Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00479
Plaintiff:
LifeNet Health
Defendant:
Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. and Embody, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2023cv01474
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
MCS Industries, Inc. v. Mirrotek, LLC
as 1:2023cv01265
Plaintiff:
MCS Industries, Inc.
Defendant:
Mirrotek, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2023cv00733
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2023cv00615
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Counter Claimant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
