Cases 71 - 80 of 421
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Amlogic Shanghai Co., Ltd.
as 6:2022cv01140
Plaintiff:
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.
Defendant:
Amlogic Shanghai Co., Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Urmet S.p.A.
as 6:2022cv00967
Plaintiff:
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.
Defendant:
Urmet S.p.A.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
CEDAR LANE v. BIO-KEY
as 2:2022cv06225
Plaintiff:
TECHNOLOGIES CEDAR LANE
Defendant:
INTERNATIONAL, INC. BIO-KEY
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 183 Patent Infringement
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. ONVU Technologies Group AG
as 6:2022cv00953
Plaintiff:
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.
Defendant:
ONVU Technologies Group AG
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Parrot SA
as 6:2022cv01076
Plaintiff:
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.
Defendant:
Parrot SA
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
CEDAR LANE TECHNOLOGIES INC. v. ZICOM TECHNOLOGY INC.
as 2:2022cv06222
Plaintiff:
CEDAR LANE TECHNOLOGIES INC.
Defendant:
ZICOM TECHNOLOGY INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Autel Robotics USA LLC
as 1:2022cv01411
Plaintiff:
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.
Defendant:
Autel Robotics USA LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Sigma Corporation
as 6:2022cv01051
Plaintiff:
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.
Defendant:
Sigma Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Skydio, Inc.
as 1:2022cv01408
Plaintiff:
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.
Defendant:
Skydio, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Boston Dynamics, Inc.
as 1:2022cv01410
Plaintiff:
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.
Defendant:
Boston Dynamics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
