Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Communication Interface Technologies, LLC v. Carters Inc.
as 4:2024cv00410
Plaintiff:
Communication Interface Technologies, LLC
Defendant:
Carters Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
S3G Technology LLC v. Carter's Inc.
as 6:2023cv00507
Plaintiff:
S3G Technology LLC
Defendant:
Carter's Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Carter v. EZ Flo International et al
as 6:2022cv00094
Defendant:
EZ Flo International, Haier US Appliance Operations, Eastman and others
Plaintiff:
Frank L. Carter c/o Ultimate Home Protector Pans, Inc. doing business as DRIPTITE
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Browse3D LLC v. Carter's, Inc
as 6:2019cv00403
Plaintiff:
Browse3D LLC
Defendant:
Carter's, Inc
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Batarga LLC v. Carter's, Inc.
as 2:2015cv01434
Plaintiff:
Batarga LLC
Defendant:
Carter's, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Oberalis LLC v. Carter's Inc.
as 2:2015cv01057
Plaintiff:
Oberalis LLC
Defendant:
Carter's Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
eDekka LLC v. Carter's Inc.
as 2:2014cv00416
Plaintiff:
eDekka LLC
Defendant:
Carter's Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Geotag, Inc. v. The William Carter Company
as 2:2012cv00446
Plaintiff:
Geotag, Inc.
Defendant:
The William Carter Company
Counter_claimant:
The William Carter Company
Counter_defendant:
Geotag, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Landmark Technology, LLC v. Body Central Corp et al
as 6:2011cv00322
Defendant:
Body Central Corp , CASUAL MALE RETAIL GROUP, INC. , Christopher & Banks, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Landmark Technology, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Dexas International LTD v. Dr Leonards Healthcare Corp
as 3:2007cv00210
Plaintiff:
Dexas International LTD
Defendant:
Dr Leonards Healthcare Corp, Q Marketing Group Ltd, Redcats USA LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
