Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. v. Grant Prideco, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv01789
Plaintiff:
HALLIBURTON ENERGY SERVICES INCORPORATED and Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Grant Prideco, Inc., ReedHycalog UK, LTD., ReedHycalog, LP and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Grant Prideco, Inc. et al v. Schlumberger Technology Corporation et al
as 4:2023cv00730
Counter Defendant:
Grant Prideco, Inc. and National Oilwell Varco, LP
Plaintiff:
ReedHycalog UK, LTD. and ReedHycalog, LP
Counter Claimant:
Schlumberger Technology Corporation
Defendant:
Smith International, Inc., Ulterra Drilling Technologies, L.P., Rockbit International Subsidiaries, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Codec Technologies LLC v. Talent Grant Tech Inc.
as 2:2016cv00884
Plaintiff:
Codec Technologies LLC
Defendant:
Talent Grant Tech Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Grant Prideco, L.P. v. HDD Rotary Sales, LLC et al
as 4:2009cv02721
Plaintiff:
Grant Prideco, L.P.
Defendant:
HDD Rotary Sales, LLC and Superior DrillPipe Manufacturing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
US Synthetic Corp v. ReedHycalog UK, Ltd. et al
as 6:2007cv00269
Plaintiff:
US Synthetic Corp
Defendant:
ReedHycalog UK, Ltd., ReedHycalog, LP and Grant Prideco Inc
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
ReedHycalog UK, Ltd. et al v. United Diamond Drilling Services, Inc et al
as 6:2007cv00251
Not Classified By Court:
Robert W Faulkner
Counter Defendant:
ReedHycalog UK, Ltd.
Plaintiff:
ReedHycalog, LP and Grant Prideco, Inc
Counter Claimant:
United Diamond Drilling Services, Inc and Varel International Ind, L.P.
Defendant:
Ulterra Drilling Technologies, L.P., Diamond Oil Well Drilling Company, Inc., DOWDCO Bits LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
