Cases 121 - 130 of 166
General Parts, Inc. v. Christensen
as 8:2009cv00127
Plaintiff:
General Parts, Inc. and General Parts, Inc.
Defendant:
Glenn A. Christensen
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Julio's Enterprises, Inc. v. Suanz, Inc. et al
as 8:2009cv00108
Plaintiff:
Julio's Enterprises, Inc.
Defendant:
Suanz, Inc., Anthony Cavazos, Jr. and Mahesh Shinde
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Predator Quest, L.L.C. v. Power Pleat Technology, Inc.
as 4:2009cv03055
Plaintiff:
Predator Quest, L.L.C. and Predator Quest, L.L.C.
Defendant:
Power Pleat Technology, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Experian Marketing Solutions v. U.S. Data Corporation et al
as 8:2009cv00024
Plaintiff:
Experian Marketing Solutions
Defendant:
U.S. Data Corporation and Jeff Herdzina
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Buck's, Inc. v. Buc-ee's Ltd.
as 8:2008cv00519
Plaintiff:
Buck's, Inc. and Buck's, Inc.
Defendant:
Buc-ee's Ltd.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Solutionary, Inc. v. Panasas, Inc.
as 8:2008cv00468
Plaintiff:
Solutionary, Inc. and Solutionary, Inc.
Defendant:
Panasas, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Circle R, Inc. et al v. Rogers et al
as 8:2008cv00337
Plaintiff:
Circle R, Inc., Circle R, Inc., Circle R, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Kevin Rogers, Kevin Rogers, Ralph Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
ERA Franchise Systems v. Realty Linc, et al
as 8:2008cv00149
Plaintiff:
ERA Franchise Systems, ERA Franchise Systems and ERA Franchise Systems
Defendant:
Realty Linc, Gary T. Thompson and Thompson Investments
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Meints v. Harrington et al
as 4:2008cv03043
Plaintiff:
Adrienne Meints and Adrienne Meints
Defendant:
Shane Harrington and Meltech
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Sav-Rx v. I Love China
as 8:2007cv00419
Plaintiff:
Sav-Rx and Sav-Rx
Defendant:
I Love China
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.