Cases 41 - 50 of 125
NY MACHINERY INC. et al v. THE KOREAN CLEANERS MONTHLY et al
as 2:2017cv12269
Plaintiff:
NY MACHINERY INC. and KLEANERS LLC
Defendant:
THE KOREAN CLEANERS MONTHLY , JOHN CHUNG and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
CELGENE CORPORATION v. CANADADRUGS.COM LTD et al
as 2:2017cv08261
Plaintiff:
CELGENE CORPORATION
Defendant:
CANADADRUGS.COM LTD, KRISTJAN THORKELSON and DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
ANGER SPORTS, LLC v. RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIVERSITY et al
as 3:2017cv08015
Defendant:
RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIVERSITY , ARIN BLAZEK , JOHN DOES 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
ANGER SPORTS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
CELGENE v. CENTRALUX LTD. et al
as 2:2017cv06775
Plaintiff:
CELGENE
Defendant:
CENTRALUX LTD., RUSLAN KIPEN and DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
CELGENE CORPORATION v. DISTINCT PHARMA et al
as 2:2017cv05303
Plaintiff:
CELGENE CORPORATION
Defendant:
DISTINCT PHARMA and DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
CELGENE CORPORATION v. GUPTA et al
as 2:2017cv05308
Plaintiff:
CELGENE CORPORATION
Defendant:
SUSHIL K GUPTA and DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
CELGENE CORPORATION v. KUMAR et al
as 2:2017cv05310
Plaintiff:
CELGENE CORPORATION
Defendant:
AMIT KUMAR, ANIL KUMAR, ZATAK SOFTECH PVT LTD and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
DECKERS OUTDOOR CORPORATION v. LAMBSKIN FASHION LLC et al
as 3:2017cv04912
Plaintiff:
DECKERS OUTDOOR CORPORATION
Defendant:
LAMBSKIN FASHION LLC and DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
LUXOTTICA GROUP, S.P.A. v. SHORE ENUFF et al
as 1:2016cv05847
Plaintiff:
LUXOTTICA GROUP S.P.A.
Defendant:
SHORE ENUFF, ONE STOP SOUVENIRS LLC, BEACH APPAREL and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
CALI v. SPIVEY-REBEL, et al
as 2:2016cv04881
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER JOHN CALI
Defendant:
MIA L. SPIVEY-REBEL, SAAS Hot Sauce The flavor that brings home, LLC, DOES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
