Trademark Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Yan Zhao, et al v. Keqiang Li, et al
as 22-7152
Plaintiff / Appellant: Yan Zhao, Amer Group LLC, An Bang Group LLC and others
Defendant / Appellee: Keqiang Li, For his official capacity of The Politburo of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), Shuqing Guo, The CCP Party Secretary The Branch Committee of Chinese Communist Party (CCP) for China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission (CBIRC), Hua Yu, the Secretary of the CCP Branch for China Insurance Security Fund Co., Ltd. and others
Yan Zhao, et al v. Keqiang Li, et al
as 22-7138
Plaintiff / Appellant: Yan Zhao, Amer Group LLC, An Bang Group LLC and others
Defendant / Appellee: Keqiang Li, For his official capacity of The Politburo of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), Shuqing Guo, The CCP Party Secretary The Branch Committee of Chinese Communist Party (CCP) for China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission (CBIRC), Hua Yu, the Secretary of the CCP Branch for China Insurance Security Fund Co., Ltd. and others
Gilbert Saucillo, et al v. Swift Transportation Company of Arizona, LLC, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-55560
Plaintiff / Appellee: GILBERT SAUCILLO and JAMES R. RUDSELL, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Plaintiff: JOHN BURNELL and JACK POLLOCK
Appellant: SADASHIV MARES
Defendant / Appellee: SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY OF ARIZONA, LLC, an Arizona corporation
Defendant: SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY INCORPORATED and DOES
Lawrence Peck, et al v. Swift Transportation Company of Arizona, LLC, et al
as 22-55468
Plaintiff / Appellee: GILBERT SAUCILLO and JAMES R. RUDSELL, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Plaintiff: JOHN BURNELL and JACK POLLOCK
Appellant: LAWRENCE PECK
Defendant / Appellee: SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY OF ARIZONA, LLC, an Arizona corporation
Defendant: SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY INCORPORATED and DOES
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2020cv03147
Defendant: CCP Baoshan Prison, KEQIANG LI, The Hon. Travis Laster and others
Plaintiff: AN BANG GROUP LLC., Amer Group LLC, All other Similarly Situated Plaintiffs as a class and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
Corker et al v. Costco Wholesale Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv00290
Plaintiff: Melanie Bondera, Colehour Bondera, Robert Smith and others
Defendant: Cameron's Coffee and Distribution Company, Gold Coffee Roasters, Inc., Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. and others
Not Classified By Court: Buchalter PC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Deckers Outdoor Corporation v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2019cv00706
Defendant: The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A" and YE LIANG and all other Defendants identified in the Amended Complaint
Plaintiff: Deckers Outdoor Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
David Gilmour Music Ltd. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2017cv02218
Defendant: The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A" and all store and All other defendants identified in the complaint
Plaintiff: David Gilmour Music Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
John Frederick Dryer, et al v. National Football League We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-3428
Plaintiff - Appellant: John Frederick Dryer, Elvin Lamont Bethea and Edward Alvin White
Plaintiff: James Lawrence Marshall, Joseph Michael Senser, Dante Anthony Pastorini and others
Defendant - Appellee: National Football League
Jed Weaver v. National Football League, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-3666
Plaintiff - Appellant: Jed Weaver
Plaintiff - Appellee: Fred Barnett, Tracy Simien, Darrell Alexander Thompson and others
Plaintiff: John Frederick Dryer, James Lawrence Marshall, Joseph Michael Senser and others
Defendant - Appellee: National Football League

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?