Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Koninklijke Philips N.V. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2024cv01447
Plaintiff:
Koninklijke Philips N.V.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Blades For Andis Oster Wahl Clippers Store, BLADES Store and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Koninklijke Philips N.V. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2024cv01234
Plaintiff:
Koninklijke Philips N.V.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A and ZunBao
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Koninklijke Philips N.V. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2023cv01707
Plaintiff:
Koninklijke Philips N.V.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, AM devotee Store, AM-Accessories Store and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Koninklijke Philips N.V. v. 10793060 Canada Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv01910
Defendant:
Electronics AG Inc., Innovative Warehouse Solutions, LLC, BoxSource.com, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Koninklijke Philips N.V.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Philips North America LLC et al v. KPI Healthcare, Inc. et al
as 8:2019cv01765
Defendant:
KPI Healthcare, Inc., KPI Healthcare Ecommerce, Inc. and Does 1-10, inclusive
Plaintiff:
Koninklijke Philips N.V. and Philips North America LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Ginta Lapina &, Gingin Management Ltd. v. Men Women N.Y. Model Management Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv06890
Plaintiff:
Ginta Lapina &, Gingin Management Ltd.
Defendant:
Men Women N.Y. Model Management Inc. , Women Management Inc., Women Model Management Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
