Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Antetokounmpo v. Koch et al
as 1:2022cv01749
Plaintiff:
GIANNIS ANTETOKOUNMPO
Defendant:
JEFFREY KOCH, MIKE MAULE, DANIEL PARKER and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
1-800 Contacts, Inc. v. JAND, Inc.
as 1:2021cv06966
Plaintiff:
1-800 Contacts, Inc.
Defendant:
JAND, Inc., d/b/a Warby Parker and JAND, Inc. doing business as Warby Parker
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
The Heisman Trophy Trust v. Leavitt et al
as 1:2018cv09051
Defendant:
Kimball Dean Parker, Middleton Joseph, Chase Leavitt and others
Plaintiff:
The Heisman Trophy Trust
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Edie Parker LLC v. Brettschneider
as 1:2017cv03672
Plaintiff:
Edie Parker LLC
Defendant:
Alison Brettschneider
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Edie Parker LLC v. Milly LLC
as 1:2016cv07339
Plaintiff:
Edie Parker LLC
Defendant:
Milly LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Maher v. Parker
as 6:2015cv01436
Plaintiff:
Edward F. Maher
Defendant:
Philip Morgan Parker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Edie Parker LLC v. Smolen
as 1:2015cv09163
Plaintiff:
Edie Parker LLC
Defendant:
Beth Smolen and RUBR Enterprises Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121
Alyssa Ann Sportsfishing, Inc. v. Parker et al
as 2:2014cv04092
Plaintiff:
Alyssa Ann Sportsfishing, Inc.
Defendant:
Montauk Fishing Charter Service, Gilbert Parker and Jill Winkleman
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Parker Waichman, LLP v. Gilman Law LLP et al
as 2:2012cv04784
Defendant:
Gilman Law LLP and Robert Laraia
Counter Claimant:
Robert Laraia
Counter Defendant:
Parker Waichman, LLP
Plaintiff:
Parker Waichman, LLP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Parker et al v. Textiles From Europe, Inc.
as 1:2012cv04843
Plaintiff:
Bryan Keith Parker and Bryan Keith Design, LLC
Defendant:
Textiles From Europe, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
