Cases 11 - 20 of 1,952
Weiss v. Kaman Corporation et al
as 3:2024cv00512
Plaintiff:
Steven Weiss
Defendant:
Kaman Corporation, Aisha M. Barry, A. William Higgins and others
Interested Party:
Matthew Jones
Jung v. Peisert et al
as 1:2024cv00383
Plaintiff:
Changyoung Jung
Defendant:
Daniel A. Peisert, Paul Schwichtenberg, Heather L. Mason and others
Jones v. M.D.C. Holdings Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00360
Plaintiff:
Robert Jones
Defendant:
M.D.C. Holdings Inc., Larry A. Mizel, David D. Mandarich and others
Miller v. M.D.C. Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00746
Plaintiff:
Bruce Miller
Defendant:
M.D.C. Holdings, Inc., Larry A. Mizel, David D. Mandarich and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 Securities Exchange Act
Gervat v. Freda et al
as 1:2024cv01983
Plaintiff:
Hugues Gervat
Defendant:
Fabrizio Freda, Ronald S. Lauder, Leonard A. Lauder and others
Targgart v. Next Bridge Hydrocarbons, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01927
Plaintiff:
Todd Targgart
Defendant:
Next Bridge Hydrocarbons, Inc., Ken Rice, George Palikaras and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Clark v. PGT Innovations, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00283
Plaintiff:
John Clark
Defendant:
PGT Innovations, Inc., Rodney Hershberger, Sheree Bargabos and others
Gurewitz v. M.D.C. Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00581
Plaintiff:
Marvin Gurewitz
Defendant:
M.D.C. Holdings, Inc., Larry A. Mizel, David D. Mandarich and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 Securities Exchange Act
Tai v. Seu et al
as 3:2024cv01198
Plaintiff:
Alexander Tai
Defendant:
Scott W. H. Seu, Thomas B. Fargo, Celeste A. Connors and others
Brian Davis, et al v. Lucinda Baier, et al
as 24-5147
Plaintiff:
BRIAN DAVIS, derivatively on behalf of Brookdale Senior Living Inc., ROBERT BAZINET, derivatively on behalf of Brookdale Senior Living Inc. and BRIAN BICKETT, derivatively on behalf of Brookdale Senior Living Inc.
Defendant:
LUCINDA M. BAIER, T. ANDREW SMITH, STEVEN E. SWAIN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
