Cases 11 - 20 of 149
Lowthorp v. Mesa Air Group Incorporated et al
as 2:2020cv00648
Defendant:
Mitchell Gordon, Don Skiados, Dana J Lockhart and others
Plaintiff:
David G Lowthorp
Petitioner:
Bennett R Glover, Marc D Behr, City of Pittsburgh Comprehensive Municipal Pension Trust Fund and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
In re Grand Canyon Education, Inc. Securities Litigation
as 1:2020cv00639
Defendant:
Daniel E. Bachus, Grand Canyon Education, Inc. and Brian E. Mueller
Plaintiff:
The City of Hialeah Employees' Retirement System, Fire and Police Pension Association of Colorado, Oakland County Employees Retirement System and others
Dixon v. Hill International, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01374
Plaintiff:
Brian Dixon
Defendant:
Hill International, Inc., David Sgro, Raouf S. Ghali and others
Jenkins v. Hill International, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv08871
Plaintiff:
Shannon Jenkins
Defendant:
Hill International, Inc., David Sgro, Raouf S. Ghali and others
Stein v. Hill International, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv07907
Plaintiff:
Shiva Stein
Defendant:
Hill International, Inc., David Sgro, Raouf S. Ghali and others
Riley v. Hill International, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv08983
Plaintiff:
Sean Riley
Defendant:
Hill International, Inc., David Sgro, Raouf S. Ghali and others
Nguyen v. Epizyme, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv06091
Plaintiff:
Michael Nguyen
Defendant:
Epizyme, Inc., Ken Bate, Roy A. Beveridge and others
West Palm Beach Police Pension Fund v. SelectQuote, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv08279
Plaintiff:
West Palm Beach Police Pension Fund
Defendant:
SelectQuote, Inc., Timothy Danker, Raffaele Sadun and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Calimer v. Epizyme, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv06027
Plaintiff:
Charles Calimer
Defendant:
Epizyme, Inc., Ken Bate, Roy A. Beveridge and others
Savage v. Epizyme, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv06165
Plaintiff:
Alexander Savage
Defendant:
Epizyne, Inc., Grant Bogle, David M. Mott and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
