Cases 11 - 18 of 18
LITWIN v. WILLIAM SMOOT ANTLE et al
as 2:2016cv01569
Plaintiff:
HAROLD LITWIN
Defendant:
WILLIAM SMOOT ANTLE, III, GEORGE BABICH, JR., STEPHEN N. DAVID and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
MESSNER v. USA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv05427
Plaintiff:
STEVEN P. MESSNER
Defendant:
USA TECHNOLOGIES, INC., STEPHEN P. HERBERT, DAVID F. DEMEDIO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ARKANSAS TEACHER RETIREMENT SYSTEM v. DFC GLOBAL CORP. et al
as 2:2014cv01705
Plaintiff:
ARKANSAS TEACHER RETIREMENT SYSTEM
Defendant:
DFC GLOBAL CORP. , JEFFREY A. WEISS , RANDY UNDERWOOD and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
GAER v. EDUCATION MANAGEMENT CORP. et al
as 2:2010cv01061
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS N. GAER, OKLAHOMA POLICE PENSION & RETIREMENT SYSTEM and SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
Defendant:
EDUCATION MANAGEMENT CORP., TODD S. NELSON, EDWARD H. WEST and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA-PUBLIC SCHOOL EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM v. CITIGROUP INC. et al
as 2:2011cv02583
Plaintiff:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA-PUBLIC SCHOOL EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM
Defendant:
CITIGROUP INC. , CITIGROUP CAPITAL XXI , GARY CRITTENDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
TIRPAK et al v. USA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv05920
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY M. TIRPAK and CRAIG W. THOMAS
Defendant:
USA TECHNOLOGIES, INC., GEORGE R. JENSEN, JR., STEPHEN P. HERBERT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
USA TECHNOLGIES, INC. v. DOE et al
as 2:2009cv03899
Plaintiff:
USA TECHNOLGIES, INC.
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, JANE DOE and STOKKLERK
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
USA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. DOE et al
as 2:2009cv00661
Plaintiff:
USA TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Defendant:
JOHN DOE and JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
