Cases 11 - 15 of 15
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Giguiere et al
as 3:2018cv01530
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Oliver-Barret Lindsay, Annetta Budhu, Gannon Giguiere and others
Intervenor:
AUSA United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of California
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Tennstar Energy, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv00151
Defendant:
Tennstar Energy, Inc., David R. Greenlee, Richard P. Underwood and others
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Intervenor:
United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Shapiro
as 1:2015cv07045
Interested Party:
Alliancebernstein, L.P. and Putnam Investments LLC
Defendant:
Michael A. Gramins, Tyler G. Peters and Ross B. Shapiro
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Intervenor:
United States Attorney's Office, District of Connecticut
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. Cioffi et al
as 1:2008cv02457
Plaintiff:
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Ralph Cioffi and Matthew M. Tannin
Interpleader:
United States Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of New York
Interested Party:
Joint Official Liquidators of Bear Stearns High-Grade Structured Credit Strategies (Overseas) Ltd. and Bear Stearns High-Grade Structured Credit Strategies Enhanced Leverage (Overseas) Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Sec. & Exch. Comm. v. Brightpoint, Inc., et al
as 1:2003cv07045
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission, Securities and Exchange Commission, Securities and Exchange Commission and others
Defendant:
Timothy Harcharik
Intervenor:
United States Attorney's Office, Southern District of Indiana
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
