Cases 31 - 40 of 52
PARIKH v. RUDOLPH TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv17607
Defendant:
JOHN R. WHITTEN, RUDOLPH TECHNOLOGIES, INC., JEFFREY A. AUKERMAN and others
Plaintiff:
NIRAV PARIKH
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. LEVOFF
as 2:2019cv05536
Plaintiff:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION and UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant:
GENE DANIEL LEVOFF
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
ITO-STONE v. DBV TECHNOLOGIES S.A. et al
as 2:2019cv00525
Defendant:
DANIEL TASSE, DAVID SCHILANSKY, DBV TECHNOLOGIES S.A. and others
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS ITO-STONE
KUNKEL v. ZAIS GROUP HOLDINGS, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv04018
Plaintiff:
LARRY KUNKEL
Defendant:
ZAIS GROUP HOLDINGS, INC., CHRISTIAN M ZUGEL, DANIEL CURRY and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
KUNKEL v. ZAIS GROUP HOLDINGS, INC. et al
as 3:2018cv04018
Plaintiff:
LARRY KUNKEL
Defendant:
ZAIS GROUP HOLDINGS, INC., CHRISTIAN M ZUGEL, DANIEL CURRY and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. KITA et al
as 3:2017cv06603
Defendant:
EVAN KITA, DANIEL PEREZ, CHIANG YU and others
Plaintiff:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
ZAMPIRRI v. PLATINUM PARI-MUTUEL HOLDINGS, INC. et al
as 2:2017cv01465
Plaintiff:
DANIEL ZAMPIRRI
Defendant:
PLATINUM PARI-MUTUEL HOLDINGS, INC., PAUL BAIONI, JOHN MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
CARMACK v. AMAYA INC. et al
as 1:2016cv01884
Plaintiff:
JAMES CARMACK
Defendant:
AMAYA INC. , DAVID BAAZOV and DANIEL SEBAG
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. RIVERA et al
as 3:2016cv01636
Plaintiff:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant:
DANIEL RIVERA, MATTHEW RIVERA, ROBBINS LANE PROPERTIES INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
PARKER v. PTC THERAPEUTICS, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv01384
Plaintiff:
DANIEL PARKER
Defendant:
PTC THERAPEUTICS, INC. , STUART PELTZ and SHANE KOVACS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
