Cases 41 - 50 of 1,552
Smith v. Crowl et al
as 1:2023cv01474
Plaintiff:
Reginald Dominick Smith
Defendant:
Robert B. Crowl and Flagship Credit Acceptance
Smith v. Avid Technology, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01137
Plaintiff:
Nathan Smith
Defendant:
Avid Technology, Inc., John P. Wallace, Christian A. Asmar and others
Marti et al v. Mahadevia et al
as 1:2023cv01133
Plaintiff:
Guillermo Marti and Felicia Marti JT Ten
Defendant:
Ankit Mahadevia, Satyavrat Shukla, Milind Deshpande and others
Nominal Defendant:
Spero Therapeutics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Roberts v. Talaris Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01063
Plaintiff:
Stacie Roberts
Defendant:
Talaris Therapeutics, Inc., Francois Nader, Sandip Agarwala and others
Carlisle v. Talaris Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv08520
Plaintiff:
Samuel Carlisle
Defendant:
Talaris Therapeutics, Inc., Francois Nader, Sandip Agarwala and others
Wieder v. Talaris Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv08355
Plaintiff:
Ephraim Wieder
Defendant:
Talaris Therapeutics, Inc., Geoff MacKay, Gaurav D. Shah and others
Navarro v. Beard et al
as 1:2023cv08174
Plaintiff:
Cristian Navarro
Defendant:
Gregory A. Beard, Ricardo Larroude, William B. Spence and others
Nominal Defendant:
Stronghold Digital Mining, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 sv Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Irminger v. Dichter et al
as 1:2023cv06777
Plaintiff:
Philip Irminger
Defendant:
Kenneth Dichter, Todd Smith, David Adelman and others
Wilson v. Beard et al
as 1:2023cv07840
Plaintiff:
Tom Wilson
Defendant:
Gregory A. Beard, William B. Spence, Ricardo R. A Larroude and others
Nominal Defendant:
Stronghold Digital Mining, Inc.
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Cristian Navarro
Smith v. Zynerba Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00947
Plaintiff:
Morgan Smith
Defendant:
Zynerba Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Armando Anido, Warren D. Cooper and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
