Cases 1 - 10 of 101
Jaar v. Northern Genesis Acquisition Corp. et al
as 1:2024cv02155
Plaintiff:
Jacques Jaar
Defendant:
Northern Genesis Acquisition Corp., Ian Robertson, Paul Dalglish and others
Amersi v. Sheridan et al
as 3:2024cv00726
Plaintiff:
Amin Amersi
Defendant:
John F Sheridan, Leigh A Vosseller, Brian B Hansen and others
Garza v. Barbier et al
as 1:2024cv02725
Plaintiff:
Jose Garza
Defendant:
Remi Barbier, Eric J. Schoen, Richard J. Barry and others
Kearney et al v. Barbier et al
as 1:2023cv01353
Plaintiff:
Stephen Kearney
Defendant:
Remi Barbier, Lindsay Burns, Eric J. Schoen and others
Nominal Defendant:
Cassava Sciences, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Advance Trading, Inc., an Illinois Corporation v. Barone et al
as 1:2023cv01390
Plaintiff:
Advance Trading, Inc.
Defendant:
Craig Barone, Craig Robertson, Fred Dietz and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Bushansky v. Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv06768
Plaintiff:
Stephen Bushansky
Defendant:
Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc., Curtis W. Huff, William A. Hendricks, Jr. and others
Tarlecky v. Embark Technology, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv03211
Plaintiff:
Karen Tarlecky
Defendant:
Embark Technology, Inc., Elaine Chao, Patricia Chiodo and others
Daro v. Embark Technology, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv03246
Plaintiff:
Andy Daro
Defendant:
Embark Technology, Inc., Elaine Chao, Patricia Chiodo and others
Hardy v. Embark Technology, Inc. f/k/a Northern Genesis Acquisition Corp. II et al
as 3:2022cv02090
Plaintiff:
Tyler Hardy
Defendant:
Embark Technology, Inc. f/k/a Northern Genesis Acquisition Corp. II, Ian Robertson, Ken Manget and others
Matranga v. Barbier et al
as 1:2022cv00028
Plaintiff:
Patricia Matranga
Defendant:
Remi Barbier, Eric J. Schoen, James W. Kupiec and others
Nominal Defendant:
Cassava Sciences, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
