Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Ederer v. HomeStreet, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02748
Plaintiff:
Marsha Ederer
Defendant:
HomeStreet, Inc., Mark K. Mason, James R. Mitchell, Jr. and others
Jones v. Avid Technology, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01139
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jones
Defendant:
Avid Technology, Inc., John P. Wallace, Christian A. Asmar and others
Smith v. Avid Technology, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01137
Plaintiff:
Nathan Smith
Defendant:
Avid Technology, Inc., John P. Wallace, Christian A. Asmar and others
Boggs v. CNX Midstream Partners LP et al
as 1:2020cv07167
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Boggs
Defendant:
Chad A. Griffith, Hayley F. Scott, John E. Jackson and others
United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. Boggs
as 1:2019cv05672
Plaintiff:
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Marcus Boggs
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Cardenas v. Baker, Jr. et al
as 1:2019cv01466
Defendant:
Terry V. Rogers, George R. Johnson, Theodore Crumley and others
Nominal Defendant:
Hecla Mining Company
Plaintiff:
Jose Cardenas
Bruce Fiegel v. Phillips S. Baker et al
as 1:2019cv01455
Defendant:
Terry V. Rogers, George R. Johnson, Lindsay A. Hall and others
Nominal Defendant:
Hecla Mining Company
Plaintiff:
Bruce Fiegel
Jones et al v. Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00659
Plaintiff:
Frank Jones, Jr. , Beverly Jan Jones , Thomas Russell Ryan, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Inc. and Lanis Noble
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Meyer et al v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company et al
as 1:2010cv00149
Plaintiff:
William Meyer and Julie Jones
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and Curtis Boggs
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Zucco Partners, LLC, et al v. Digimarc Corporation, et al
as 06-35758
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ZUCCO PARTNERS, LLC, REX BOGGS, KENNARD MCADAM and others
Defendant - Appellee:
DIGIMARC CORPORATION, BRUCE DAVIS and E. K. RANJIT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
