Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Commodity Futures Trading Commission et al v. Red Rock Secured, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv03680
Defendant:
Shade Johnson-Kelly, Red Rock Secured, LLC, Sean Kelly and others
Plaintiff:
Commodity Futures Trading Commission, California Department of Financial Protection & Innovation, State of Hawaii, Department of Commerce and Consumer Affairs, Securities Enforcement Branch and others
Retail Wholesale Department Store Union Local 338 Retirement Fund v. Beyond Meat, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03602
Plaintiff:
Retail Wholesale Department Store Union Local 338 Retirement Fund
Defendant:
Beyond Meat, Inc., Ethan Walden Brown, Mark J. Nelson and others
Retail Wholesale Department Store Union Local 338 Retirement Fund et al v. Stitch Fix, Inc. et al
as 4:2022cv04893
Plaintiff:
Retail Wholesale Department Store Union Local 338 Retirement Fund, Retail Wholesale Department Store Union Local 338 Health & Welfare Fund, Retail Wholesale Department Store Union Local 338 General Fund and others
Defendant:
Stitch Fix, Inc., Katrina Lake, Elizabeth Spaulding and others
Commodity Futures Trading Commission et al v. Safeguard Metals LLC et al
as 2:2022cv00691
Defendant:
Jeffrey Santulan, Safeguard Metals LLC and Jeffrey Hill
Plaintiff:
Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Alabama Securities Commission, Arizona Corporation Commission and others
Petitioner:
Utah Division of Securities
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Eric Pulier
as 2:2017cv07124
Defendant:
Eric Pulier
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Petitioner:
Department of Justice
Intervenor:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
City of Sterling Heights General Employees' Retirement System et al v. Prudential Financial Inc. et al
as 2:2015mc00146
Plaintiff:
City of Sterling Heights General Employees' Retirement System , National Shopmen Pension Fund , Heavy & General Laborers Locals 472 & 172 Pension Annuity Funds and others
Defendant:
Prudential Financial Inc., Strangfeld R. John and Mark B. Grier
Movant:
California Department of Insurance and David E. Jones
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Francisco Lamadrid et al v. Bank of America NA et al
as 2:2012cv03554
Defendant:
L Alves, Banc of America Funding 2007-7 Trust, Banc of America Funding Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Adriana Estevez, Francisco Lamadrid, Richard Mendez and others
IN RE STEC, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION
as 8:2009cv01304
Plaintiff:
Fred Jean, Keith Johnson, The Port Authority of Allegheny County Retirement and Disability Allowance Plan for Employees Represented by Local 85 of the Amalgamated Transit Union and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Jonathan Fischer, Arman Rashtchi, Keith A Ovitt and others
Petitioner:
The Firefighters' Pension System of the City of Kansas City, Missouri Trust, Building Trades United Pension Pension Trust Fund and Electrical Workers Pension Fund, Local 103 I.B.E.W., STEC, Inc. Investor Group and others
Defendant:
Stec Inc, Manouch Moshayedi, Mark Moshayedi and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Raymond D Cook, J P Morgan Securities Inc, Deutsche Bank Securities Inc and others
Interested Party:
Mark Berry and Jordan Grayson
Intervenor:
West Virginia Laborers Trust Fund
New York City Employees' Retirement System et al v. Countrywide Financial Corporation et al
as 2:2008cv00492
Plaintiff:
New York City Employees' Retirement System, New York City Employees' Retirement System, New York City Employees' Retirement System and others
Defendant:
Countrywide Financial Corporation, Countrywide Capital V, Angelo R Mozilo and others
Estate Defendant:
Carlos M Garcia
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
The New York City Employees' Retirement System et al v. Berry
as 3:2008cv00246
Plaintiff:
The New York City Employees' Retirement System, The New York City Employees' Retirement System, The New York City Employees' Retirement System and others
Defendant:
Lisa C. Berry
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
