Cases 1 - 10 of 221
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. TRI-BRIDGE VENTURES, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv05711
Plaintiff:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant:
TRI-BRIDGE VENTURES, LLC and JOHN FRANCIS FORSYTHE, III
MARTIS v. MICHERY et al
as 2:2024cv02908
Plaintiff:
MARIUS MARTIS
Defendant:
DAVID MICHERY, MARY WINTER, MARK BETOR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
FORD v. MERCER et al
as 2:2024cv04894
Defendant:
TINGO GROUP, INC., DARREN MERCER, HAO CHEN and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL FORD
NEWTON AC/DC FUND L.P. v. HECTOR DAO et al
as 3:2024cv00722
Plaintiff:
NEWTON AC/DC FUND L.P.
Defendant:
HECTOR DAO, FAROOQ HASSAN and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
CLEMENTE et al v. DOE et al
as 3:2024cv00314
Plaintiff:
KEVIN CLEMENTE and BARBARA CLEMENTE
Defendant:
JANE DOE, TRENDY DIGITAL CONSULTING, INC., MAEHAL ENTERPRISES, INC. and others
BERDAN v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
RICHARD BERDAN, SUSAN K. WILSON, JESSICA BRUCKNER and others
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, THIBAUT MONGON, PAUL RUH and others
KAO et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2024cv00482
Plaintiff:
JOHN KAO and ANDREY GYUROV
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, THIBAUT MONGON, PAUL RUH and others
KAO et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 2:2024cv00482
Plaintiff:
JOHN KAO and ANDREY GYUROV
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, THIBAUT MONGON, PAUL RUH and others
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. HUGHES
as 3:2023cv21816
Plaintiff:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant:
JOHN HUGHES and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
BRAZINSKY v. AT&T INC. et al
as 2:2023cv04064
Plaintiff:
JOHN BRAZINSKY
Defendant:
AT&T INC., RANDALL L. STEPHENSON, JOHN T. STANKEY and others
Petitioner:
GENERAL RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF THE CITY OF DETROIT, BRIDGET N. SMAGALA REVOCABLE TRUST U/A DTD, SURESH KODALI and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
