Cases 1 - 10 of 469
Collins v. Masonite International Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv02779
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Collins
Defendant:
Masonite International Corporation, Robert J. Byrne, Howard C. Heckes and others
Hudda v. Hennessy et al
as 1:2024cv00449
Plaintiff:
Arif Hudda
Defendant:
Paul J. Hennessy, David K. Jones, Robert J. Mylod, Jr. and others
Jones v. Kaman Corporation et al
as 3:2024cv00513
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW JONES
Defendant:
Kaman Corporation, Aisha M. Barry, A. WILLIAMS HIGGINS and others
Jones v. M.D.C. Holdings Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00360
Plaintiff:
Robert Jones
Defendant:
M.D.C. Holdings Inc., Larry A. Mizel, David D. Mandarich and others
Strougo v. RealNetworks Inc et al
as 2:2024cv00297
Plaintiff:
Barbara Strougo
Defendant:
RealNetworks, Inc., Robert Glaser, Bruce A. Jaffe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Jones v. FaZe Holdings Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jones
Defendant:
FaZe Holdings Inc., Angela Dalton, Mickie Rosen and others
Jones v. Healthpeak Properties, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00278
Plaintiff:
Robert Jones
Defendant:
Healthpeak Properties, Inc., Katherine M. Sandstrom, Scott M. Brinker and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 Securities Exchange Act
Jones v. Applied Molecular Transport Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01390
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jones
Defendant:
Applied Molecular Transport Inc., Shawn Cross, Charlene Banard and others
Diane Owens, et al v. FirstEnergy Corporation, et al
as 23-3945
Not Classified By Court:
In re: FIRSTENERGY CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DIANE OWENS, CHANA FRAND, CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM and others
Defendant:
FIRSTENERGY CORPORATION
Defendant / Appellant:
CHARLES E. JONES
Erwin v. Veradigm Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv16205
Plaintiff:
John M. Erwin
Defendant:
Veradigm Inc., Paul M. Black, Richard J. Poulton and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
