Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Causey et al v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2022cv00638
Plaintiff:
Dianna Causey
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Lopresto vs Kijakazi
as 6:2022cv05229
Plaintiff:
Keith Lopresto
Defendant:
Dr. Kilolo Kijakazi and Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Thompson v. Social Security Administration
as 2:2020cv01843
Plaintiff:
Theresa Thompson
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Topham v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2017cv00693
Plaintiff:
Arlene Marie Topham
Defendant:
U S Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Jones v. Social Security Administration
as 2:2016cv11132
Plaintiff:
Scherry A. Jones
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Wells v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2013cv00830
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Wells
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Oaks of Mid-City Nursing & Rehabilitation Center v. United States Department of Health & Human Services and Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
as 3:2011cv00360
Plaintiff:
Oaks of Mid-City Nursing & Rehabilitation Center
Defendant:
United States Department of Health & Human Services and Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
D & W Health Services Inc. v. Sebelius et al
as 3:2011cv00186
Defendant:
Donald Berwick, M.D. and Kathleen Sebelius
Plaintiff:
D & W Health Services Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Harris v. Social Security Administration
as 2:2010cv03241
Plaintiff:
Ruth Washington Harris
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.