Cases 141 - 150 of 251
Nelson v. Saul
as 1:2019cv11387
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Michael Steven Nelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Garbino v. Saul et al
as 1:2019cv11382
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Garbino
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hull v. Berryhill
as 3:2019cv30085
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Nancy A. Berryhill and Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Mary K. Hull
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Orengo Acevedo v. Berryhill
as 3:2019cv30083
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Teodoro J. Orengo Acevedo
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Matthews v. Saul
as 1:2019cv11346
Defendant:
Nancy Berryhill and Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Matthews
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Da Silva v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2019cv11294
Plaintiff:
Michael Da Silva
Interested Party:
Social Security Administation
Defendant:
Social Security Administration and Nancy Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Devine v. Berryhill
as 4:2019cv40060
Plaintiff:
Allison Anne Devine
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Peck v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2019cv10870
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Lisa Peck
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Shisslak v. Berryhill
as 1:2019cv10768
Plaintiff:
Abigal Shisslak
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Defendant:
Nancy A Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
TETREAULT v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 4:2019cv40056
Plaintiff:
David Tetreault
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Andrew Saul
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
